I would say something in the

Abairhasan15

Given my preference, middle is best for me. As a senior-level marketer with 15 years of corporate experience, I intuitively know where to take much of the content so the additional info is often just “noise” for me to scroll through.” “The only complaint I have is that the briefs are very long. I find myself having to open the page on two tabs – one to reference the brief and another to write the content. If there’s a way to shorten or format the brief so the outline is close to the text box, that would streamline the writing process.” (Referring to updated briefs) Data Insights: What I Learned From The Writers’ Feedback I’m sure you have drawn your own conclusions after reading the writers’ feedback shared in the previous section.

However, I invite you to explore what I have learned: 1. We have improved, it’s noticeable. We’re communicating our intentions and goals more effectively than before. The details included in the updated version of our briefs help most freelancers feel guided and Lists Of Mobile Number List  more confident about their work. I understand why more experienced writers in our industry might view detailed information as “noise,” and I empathize with their perspective. However, our approach typically involves crafting briefs tailored for writers with a mid-level of expertise. We primarily process our orders on a first-come, first-served basis, and while we prioritize our “love list” of writers, they possess varying levels of expertise.




We must improve how we communicate our desired tone and style. 30% of respondents being neutral or strongly disagreeing with the statement “The desired tone and style of the content were clearly stated in the briefs” is a point of attention. Honestly, it just confirmed what we had already noticed and started to work on. We’re currently developing a new style guide to share with our writers. 3. We can remove certain sections from the briefs to make them shorter and more concise. I agree, they have indeed become a bit lengthy. Many of the sections that the writers indicated as unnecessary, such as ‘Author information,’ we use only internally, so we can certainly leave them aside.